MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B063: Unveiling the immune landscape of recurrent, MYC-driven medulloblastoma

2024· article· en· W4402266920 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ben Draper, Dean Thompson, Alaide Morcavallo, Bethany Remeniuk, John Anderson, Louis Chesler, Steven C. Clifford, Frank T. Huang, Laura Donovan

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedulloblastomaImmune systemMedicineCancer researchBiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: One of the most significant unmet clinical challenges in paediatric oncology is the development of novel therapeutic strategies for recurrent medulloblastoma (R-MB). MYC-driven MBs are defined as classically cold tumours with a low incidence of infiltrating immune cells, resulting in a therapeutic challenge. The immune landscape of recurrent medulloblastoma is yet to explored. Understanding the complex interplay between the immune system and tumour biology is pivotal for comprehending disease progression and devising tailored therapeutic strategies that consider the distinct molecular and immunological profiles of both primary and recurrent MYC-driven tumours. The identification of cell-cell communications, particularly ligand–receptor pairs, allows for the inference of significant intercellular communications based on the expression of corresponding genes. Consequently, we hypothesised that the most influential cell-cell interactions within the tumour immune microenvironment (TME) of MYC-driven MB could unveil prevalent immune-suppressive interactions and potential vulnerabilities for therapeutic exploration. Methods/Results: Paired primary-recurrent bulk RNA-sequencing data, confirmed myeloid cells as the most infiltrating immune cell type in group3-MB and group4-MB. Comprehensive spatial phenotypic and cell-cell communication analyses corroborated this discovery, validating an increased incidence of macrophages in the matched-recurrent tumours and phenotypic markers of advanced immunosuppression. Subsequently, we used innovative algorithms for 10X MB single-cell data to predict interactions between tumour-cell ligands and immune-cell receptors within the TME; macrophages emerged as the core immune-cells involved in interactions throughout the TMEs, with the most significant ligand-receptor interaction and inflammatory response between MIF and CD74.In-depth immunohistochemistry analyses of primary and recurrent group3 and group4 tumours, and exhaustive tissue microarrays demonstrated expression of both CD74 and MIF, with limited expression of CD74 within the brain. To investigate the therapeutic potential of CD74, we developed recurrent, immune competent MYC-driven medulloblastoma mouse models. Comprehensive deconvolution analysis confirmed the TME integrity of our models to mirror that of the human disease. Locoregional delivery and repeat dosing of a bioactive-CD74 peptide demonstrated significant tumour reduction in our immune-competent mouse models, demonstrating the impact of our prediction algorithm and significant therapeutic potential of targeting the CD74-MIF axis in MYC-driven primary and recurrent MB. Conclusions: Essential cellular interactions and targetable therapeutic vulnerabilities have been identified in the tumour-microenvironment of MYC-driven primary-recurrent MB. Citation Format: Ben Draper, Dean Thompson, Alaide Morcavallo, Bethany Remeniuk, John Anderson, Louis Chesler, Steve Clifford, Frank Huang, Laura K. Donovan. Unveiling the immune landscape of recurrent, MYC-driven medulloblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr B063.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→