MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B081: EWS::FLI1 alters DNA damage induced protein dynamics at the RNAPII CTD

2024· article· en· W4402267969 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aiola Stoja, Xiaoping Xu, David S. Libich, Alexander J.R. Bishop

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCTDDNA damageBiophysicsCell biologyChemistryBiologyPhysicsDNAGeneticsGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is an aggressive pediatric bone cancer with limited treatment options, highlighting a drastic need for novel therapeutics. EwS is driven by translocation of the EWSR1 low complexity domain and most often the DNA binding domain of FLI1, making up the oncogenic fusion protein EWS::FLI1. Accumulating evidence suggests that EWS::FLI1 alters the biophysical properties of EWS and EWS::FLI1 phase separated condensates. We have previously shown that EWS::FLI1 prevents the release of the double strand break (DSB) repair protein BRCA1 from RNA Polymerase II (RNAPII) complexes, inhibiting BRCA1 mediated DSB repair. However, how EWS::FLI1 alters protein dynamics at the RNAPII complexes is not understood. In this work we show that EWS::FLI1 co-localization to RNAPII C-Terminal Domain (CTD) protein hubs causes enhanced phase separation, imitating a hardening of RNAPII CTD condensates. Additionally, we find that treatment with DNA damaging agents decreases BRCA1 occupancy at RNAPII CTD protein hubs. Expression of EWS::FLI1 in this in cellulo system suggests inhibition of BRCA1 release from RNAPII phase separated entities upon DNA damage. Overall, this data indicates that EWS::FLI1 mediated changes in phase state alters heterotypic protein-protein interactions at the RNAPII complexes. Furthermore, we find that RNAPII CTD phase separated entities are refractory to THZ1 drug treatment. This underscores the physiological significance condensate biology plays in drug efficacy and drug resistance. In conclusion, our results prompt further investigation into EWS::FLI1 affects on protein-protein interactions at RNAPII condensates. Our findings are novel as we look at heterotypic phase condensate biology in cellulo, whereas most phase studies are conducted in vitro and focus on homotypic interactions. Moreover, though much work was conducted on BRCA1 and RNAPII interaction and damage-induced release in the 1990s and early 2000s, little is understood about the relationship of BRCA1 and RNAPII and certainly not in the context of EWS::FLI1. Importantly, this work provides a basis for the physiological role of condensate biology in EWS::FLI1 mediated BRCA1 and RNAPII protein-protein dynamics. Citation Format: Aiola Stoja, Xiaoping Xu, David S Libich, Alexander J. R. Bishop. EWS::FLI1 alters DNA damage induced protein dynamics at the RNAPII CTD [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr B081.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→