Rhizobium aouanii sp. nov., efficient nodulating rhizobia isolated from Acacia saligna roots in Tunisia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three bacterial strains, 1AS14IT, 1AS12I and 6AS6, isolated from root nodules of Acacia saligna, were characterized using a polyphasic approach. Phylogenetic analysis based on rrs sequences placed all three strains within the Rhizobium leguminosarum complex. Further phylogeny, based on 1 756 bp sequences of four concatenated housekeeping genes (recA, atpD, glnII and gyrB), revealed their distinction from known rhizobia species of the R. leguminosarum complex (Rlc), forming a distinct clade. The closest related species, identified as Rhizobium laguerreae, with a sequence identity of 96.4% based on concatenated recA-atpD-glnII-gyrB sequences. The type strain, 1AS14IT, showed average nucleotide identity (ANI) values of 94.9, 94.3 and 94.1% and DNA–DNA hybridization values of 56.1, 57.4 and 60.0% with the type strains of closest known species: R. laguerreae, Rhizobium acaciae and ‘Rhizobium indicum’, respectively. Phylogenomic analyses using 81 up-to-date bacteria core genes and the Type (Strain) Genome Server pipeline further supported the uniqueness of strains 1AS14IT, 1AS12I and 6AS6. The relatedness of the novel strains to NCBI unclassified Rhizobium sp. (396 genomes) and metagenome-derived genomes showed ANI values from 76.7 to 94.8% with a species-level cut-off of 96%, suggesting that strains 1AS14I, 1AS12I and 6AS6 are a distinct lineage. Additionally, differentiation of strains 1AS14IT, 1AS12I and 6AS6 from their closest phylogenetic neighbours was achieved using phenotypic, physiological and fatty acid content analyses. Based on the genomic, phenotypic and biochemical data, we propose the establishment of a novel rhizobial species, Rhizobium aouanii sp. nov., with strain 1AS14IT designated as the type strain (=DSM 113914T=LMG 33206T). This study contributes to the understanding of microbial diversity in nitrogen-fixing symbioses, specifically within Acacia saligna ecosystems in Tunisia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".