MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Faster Complete Addition Laws for Montgomery Curves

2024· article· en· W4402272061 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawMathematicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An addition law for an elliptic curve is complete if it is defined for all possible pairs of input points on the elliptic curve. In Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), a complete addition law provides a natural protection against side-channel attacks which are based on Simple Power Analysis (SPA). Montgomery curves are a specific family of elliptic curves that play a crucial role in ECC because of its well-known Montgomery ladder, particularly in the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange (ECDHKE) protocol and the Elliptic Curve factorization Method (ECM). However, the complete addition law for Montgomery curves, as stated in the literature, has a computational cost of 14M+ 2D, where M,D denote the costs of a field multiplication and a field multiplication by a constant, respectively. The lack of a competitive complete addition law has led implementers towards twisted Edwards curves, which offer a complete addition law at a lower cost of 8M+ 1D for appropriately chosen curve constants.In this paper, we introduce extended Montgomery coordinates as a novel representation for points on Montgomery curves. This coordinate system enables us to define birational multiplication-free maps between the extended twisted Edwards coordinates and extended Montgomery coordinates. Using this map, we can transfer the complete addition laws from twisted Edwards curves to Montgomery curves without incurring additional multiplications or squarings. In addition, we employ a technique known as scaling to refine the addition laws for twisted Edwards curves, which results in having i) Complete addition laws with the costs varying between 8M+1D and 9M+1D for a broader range of twisted Edwards curves, ii) Incomplete addition laws for twisted Edwards curves with the cost of 8M. Consequently, by leveraging our birational multiplication-free maps, we present complete addition laws for Montgomery curves with the cost of 8M+1D. This shows a significant improvement for complete addition law for Montgomery curves by reducing the computational cost by 6M+ 1D. This improvement makes Montgomery curves a more attractive option for applications where an efficient complete addition law is essential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it