Combination of Waist Circumference and Circulating Levels of IGFBP-2 as a Simple Screening Tool for Early Detection of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Optimal non-invasive biomarkers for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) remain elusive, especially in the detection of early stages. This study tested in an asymptomatic cohort of 171 men (49.2 ± 8.6 years) and 131 women (51.8 ± 8.5 years) whether waist circumference (WC) and circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 2 (IGFBP-2) could identify individuals with liver fat > 5% as assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Participants with high WC (> 85 or 90 cm for women and men, respectively) and low IGFBP-2 (< 260 or 230 ng/mL for women and men, respectively) were characterized by a higher risk of having MASLD (46.3%, p < 0.0001). Among the 68 individuals with MASLD, 73.5% fell into the subgroup with high WC and low IGFBP-2 concentrations ( p < 0.0001). When combined, these markers reached a sensitivity of 73.5% and specificity of 75.2% for MASLD. Thus, WC and plasma IGFBP-2 levels might be useful as a novel, simple, and non-invasive index to support existing tools in the identification of individuals at risk of early-stage MASLD. Keywords: humans, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 2, waist circumference, hepatic fat, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, biomarker, plasma, non-invasive
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".