Links between the Botswana High and drought modes over southern Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Drought is one of the most devastating threats to the livelihoods of the southern African population, who mainly rely on rain‐fed agriculture for income. Previous studies have highlighted that the Botswana High influences drought over the region; however, its influence on the spatial modes of drought remains unknown. This study examines the spatiotemporal structures of drought modes (DMs) over southern Africa and their link with the Botswana High in observation, reanalysis and Model for Prediction Across Scales (MPAS). To characterize droughts, the study uses the 3‐month scale standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI). Spatiotemporal characteristics of the DMs are identified using empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis on SPI and SPEI. EOF analysis is also used to identify the spatiotemporal characteristics of the Botswana High. The relationship between each DM and the Botswana High is quantified using correlation and R 2 analysis. In all the datasets (Climate Research Unit (CRU), European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts version 5 (ERA5), 20th Century reanalysis II (20C) and MPAS), the most dominant five DMs (hereafter DM1–DM5) over southern Africa jointly explain more than 60% of the interannual variability in the 3‐month scale summer droughts for SPEI and SPI. CRU, ERA5 and MPAS agree that the Botswana High correlates with the interannual variability of DM1, with a stronger correlation in ERA5 ( r = −0.85) compared to MPAS ( r = −0.42) and CRU ( r = −0.35). Additionally, wet years (+ve SPEI and SPI) are characterized by a weak Botswana High and drought years (−ve SPEI and SPI) by a strong Botswana High. The wet and dry years correspond to the −ve and +ve phases of El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), respectively. Given this, the results of this study suggest that the Botswana High might be a teleconnection pattern through which ENSO signals influence DM1 over the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".