MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402302878 · doi:10.1111/amet.13341

For Putin and for Sharia: Dagestani Muslims and the Islamic State By Iwona Kaliszewska. Translated by Arthur Barys. Ithaca, NY: Northern Illinois University Press, an imprint of Cornell University Press, 2023. 168 pp.

2024· article· en· W4402302878 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐François Ratelle

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Ethnologist · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamShariaState (computer science)Political scienceTheologySociologyReligious studiesLawMedia studiesPhilosophyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The book, authored by Iwona Kaliszewka, offers a comprehensive account of the development of Islamism in Dagestan in the 21st century, delving into the challenges and complexities arising from the collapse of the Soviet Union. While addressing well-studied academic topics like terrorism and Islamism, Kaliszewka challenges simplistic narratives by immersing herself in meticulous ethnographic inquiry, exploring the intricate layers of Dagestan's multiethnic, religious, and linguistic landscape. The book's strength lies in its extensive multiyear fieldwork conducted in a highly volatile environment, where the author confronted a myriad of ethical, logistical, and security challenges. Despite Dagestan's reputation as “the most dangerous place in Europe,” and despite Russia's bureaucratic, ironfisted response to jihadist insurgency, Kaliszewka not only interviewed people in Dagestan but did so consistently over nearly a decade. The exceptional nature of her fieldwork is matched only by her counterintuitive argument, highlighting the unexpected interplay between Sharia law and Islamism, nostalgia for the Soviet Union, and the policies of Vladimir Putin's Russia. Kaliszewka adeptly underscores the challenges faced by Dagestanis after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, which led to the cessation of modernization efforts and a lack of cohesive social projects for economic and social development. She illuminates the deep-seated nostalgia for the Soviet era among Dagestanis, including the Stalinist period, and explores the intriguing connection forged between the Soviet past and the newly adopted aspirations for an Islamic state governed by Sharia law. Through her fieldwork, Kaliszewka demonstrates how Islamization is perceived as a logical progression from socialism, offering an alternative to the tumultuous capitalism experienced in the 1990s, while also seeking to preserve Dagestan's cultural identity, social morality, and traditional way of life. In addition to challenging conventional narratives, Kaliszewka's research offers a nuanced perspective on Islam in Dagestan, transcending the traditional dichotomy between state-sanctioned Islam and perceived “nontraditional” forms such as Wahhabism and Salafism. Through her interviews and vignettes, she traces the evolution of attitudes toward Wahhabism and nontraditional Islam in Dagestan. From moral and social panic in her early fieldwork to social acceptance of Islamic diversity in the context of a jihadist insurgency, the book reveals a complex interplay of social dynamics and lived experiences among Dagestanis. By interrogating the concept of new Muslims in the Caucasus, Kaliszewka shows how Islam in Dagestan has more to do with individuals and their own lived experience than clear categories delineating Islam. The book shows the eclectic and heterogeneous experience of people as Muslims in Dagestan, describing the vast array of Islamic practices. Rather than presenting the discourse surrounding the development of a unitary Islamic State in Dagestan focused on a social and violent revolution, Kaliszewka's book depicts it as a gradual and consequential project understood very differently by Islamists. This analysis is a breath of fresh air in a scholarly literature saturated by research focusing on the creation of the so-called Islamic State in Syria and Iraq, its extremist propaganda, and its resonance in the North Caucasus. At the same time, the book provides a multifaceted examination of terrorism in Dagestan, moving beyond a narrow security-focused lens to explore the broader sociopolitical and cultural implications of counterterrorism. From the description of the everyday encounters of terrorism and counterterrorism in the life of Dagestanis to the manufacturing of counterterrorism as racketeering and a business venture, the author expands the understanding of violence and terrorism to a whole different perspective. The many vignettes and field-based stories underline the lived experience of Dagestanis facing the challenges of living in a war-torn republic. The book avoids the pitfall of strictly focusing on extraordinary phenomena such as the rise of the Islamic State or the wave of suicide bombings. It provides an anthropologically rich description of the complexity of Dagestan and its dysfunctional sociopolitical system. Kaliszewka walks the reader through the slippery slope of conducting fieldwork in Dagestan, resulting from her insider as well as outsider perspectives as a foreigner with extensive local networks. The author demonstrates how intensive ethnographic research in Dagestan has uncovered a changing perspective on the role of Islamic law, the understanding of insurgent mobilization and local support, the role of security forces, and the overall perception of hope and the future in the North Caucasus republic. She shows that there is a thin line between the normalization process of living in a perpetual counterterrorist environment and its impact on research and moral dilemmas. Overall, the book offers a nuanced and complex depiction of Dagestan, setting the stage for a better understanding of the social landscape and political dynamics of the rise and consolidation of Islamism in the republic. Connecting the collapse of the Soviet Union with Dagestan's Islamic revival and the rise of a jihadist insurgency in the region, Kaliszewka provides a rich and detailed analysis of life in the peripheries of the Russian republic. The richness of the author's ethnographic material and the analysis will make this book a reference for scholars studying the influence of the Islamic State in the North Caucasus, Islamism in the post-Soviet period, and the growing trend of decolonization initiated by the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican EthnologistSame topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207