MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402306700 · doi:10.18280/ts.410437

Machine Learning-Based Classification of Mosquito Wing Beats Using Mel Spectrogram Images and Ensemble Modeling

2024· article· en· W4402306700 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bandi Vamsi, Ali Al Bataineh, Bhanu Prakash Doppala

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectrogramComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Speech recognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These days, many dreadful diseases are caused by mosquitoes, along with other types of infections.Mosquitoes are also called silent feeders.Due to this ability, mosquitoes take advantage of increasing their capacity to spread diseases.Many life-threatening diseases such as malaria, dengue, Zika, yellow fever, and chikungunya are caused by these mosquitoes.These diseases are caused by viruses, parasites, and bacterial pathogens through various vectors like Aedes aegypti and Culex.Due to the rapid increase in cases worldwide, there is a necessity to deploy an intelligent machine-automated model to decrease the spread of infections.The method used in this study detects different types of mosquitoes responsible for spreading these diseases.The key to controlling the spread of infection is to detect the type of mosquito based on the beat of its wings.The sound recordings related to mosquito wing beats, collected from different sources, are used in this study.These recordings are divided based on the mosquito species through max pooling and convolution models.The entire work is framed under three segments: identifying the recorded sound audio file to get a Mel spectrogram image, extracting features using pooling and convolution methods, and identifying the mosquito type through an ensemble method using classifiers like Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Decision Tree.The frequency waves are used to transform the audio recordings into spectrograms in the preprocessing phase.The spectrogram filter is used to eliminate noise from the spectrogram images.Vector values are obtained using pooling and convolution methods.The values from the classifiers used in this work are then fed into the ensemble method to identify the mosquito type based on its wing beats.Based on the final results and observations, the SVM classifier achieved the highest accuracy, with 95.05% for the type Aedes albopictus, compared to the other classifiers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207