MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402307267 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.08.332

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction of a Hybrid-Powered Ferry using Deep Reinforcement Learning for Power Load Distribution

2024· article· en· W4402307267 on OpenAlexaff
Adly M. M. Abd‐Alla, R. Bhushan Gopaluni, Patrick Kirchen

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMaritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasReduction (mathematics)ReinforcementPower (physics)Reinforcement learningEnvironmental scienceAutomotive engineeringGreenhouseDistribution (mathematics)Computer scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEcologyStructural engineeringPhysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the use of the twin delayed deep deterministic policy gradient (TD3), a deep reinforcement learning algorithm, to reduce the cumulative greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the sailing trips of a hybrid-powered roll-on roll-of liquefied natural gas ferry. The objective of the algorithm is to optimally control the power load distribution between the ferry’s engines and battery to achieve a reduction in GHG emissions. Results from this study show that the TD3 agent achieved an average reduction in cumulative GHG emissions by 5% against actual operations for the sailing trips that were analyzed. The performance of the TD3 agent was compared to a rule-based energy management strategy (EMS) in which the ferry’s battery was used to operate the ferry completely at low load operations and provide surplus power when the power demand was greater than the engine rating. The rule-based EMS failed to achieve GHG emissions reductions against actual operations thereby indicating the efficacy of the TD3 agent in achieving emissions reductions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicMaritime Transport Emissions and EfficiencyFrench-language works237,207