MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402309766 · doi:10.1016/j.avsurg.2024.100333

Slash and splash technique for treatment of infrainguinal vein bypass graft stenosis

2024· article· en· W4402309766 on OpenAlexaff
Apoorva Bhandari, John H. Landau, Stewart Kribs, Adam Power, Audra A. Duncan, Luc Dubois

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Vascular Surgery - Brief Reports and Innovations · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Artery Disease Management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSplashMedicineStenosisVeinSlash (logging)SurgeryCardiologyMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autologous venous bypasses effectively treat extensive infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease with excellent long-term patency rates. However, one-third of patients will experience significant vein graft stenosis, particularly within the first-year post-bypass. Current endovascular interventions yield suboptimal results, with reported re-stenosis rates of 20–50 %. This study investigates the efficacy of cutting balloon (‘slash’) followed by a drug-eluting balloon (‘splash’) angioplasty in treating vein graft stenosis. This single-centre retrospective review examines consecutive patients who underwent the ‘Slash and Splash’ technique for treating significant stenosis (>70 % stenosis and/or PSV >300 cm/s) in infrainguinal autologous bypasses from June 2017 to January 2023. Follow-up duplex ultrasound was conducted at three months, six months, and yearly thereafter. Primary outcomes assessed technical success and graft patency. Secondary outcomes included major adverse limb events (MALEs), and major amputations Twenty-three patients (mean age 67.4 ± 8.1 years, 44 % male) with significant vein graft stenoses underwent the ‘Slash and Splash’ method to salvage their bypasses. Most patients (91 %) had critical limb-threatening ischemia. Nine patients received femoral-popliteal grafts and 14 received femoral-tibial grafts, with18 utilizing saphenous in-situ conduits. The average follow-up duration was 26.1 ± 16.7 months, with no losses to follow-up. The median time from initial bypass to angioplasty was 10 months. Primary technical success was 100 % and primary patency was 95 %, with only one restenosis requiring repeat angioplasty during follow-up. Primary-assisted and secondary patency rates were 100 %. Freedom from MALEs was 90 %, with two patients requiring amputations secondary to diabetic foot infections, although bypasses remained patent at the time of amputation. The ‘Slash and Splash’ technique effectively treats severe infrainguinal vein bypass graft stenosis, offering excellent mid-term patency and freedom from MALEs. Adoption of this technique should be considered in the treatment of hemodynamically significant vein graft stenoses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Vascular Surgery - Brief Reports and InnovationsSame topicPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207