Kinesin-8 motors dimerize by folding their proximal tail domain into a compact helical bundle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Kinesin-8 motor proteins help align and segregate chromosomes during mitosis by regulating the dynamics of kinetochore-attached microtubules and the length and position of the mitotic spindle. Some kinesin-8 isoforms accomplish these roles by operating as multifunctional mechanoenzymes that can traverse microtubules, accumulate at the microtubule plus-ends, and then remove terminal αβ-tubulin subunits. While these activities are mainly powered by the motor domain, whose unique structure-function relationships have been recently reported, the non-motor tail domain contains integral functional elements that have not been structurally illuminated. Using the Candida albicans Kip3 protein as a kinesin-8 model system, we present an X-ray crystal structure and hydrodynamic data showing how the motor domain-proximal segment of the tail directs the assembly of two kinesin-8 polypeptides into a homodimer that forms the stalk of this motor. Unlike the extended coiled coil-forming helices of most other motile kinesin stalks, the proximal tail of Ca Kip3 folds into a compact 92 Å-long four-helix bundle that dimerizes. The first and third helices provide most of the surface area for the dimer interface, while the other two helices brace the folded stalk structure. The upper and lower lobules of the helical bundle are separated by a flexible hinge that gives the exterior faces of the stalk slightly different shapes when bent. We propose that these unique characteristics provide structural rigidity to the kinesin-8 stalk, as well as sites for transient interactions with kinesin-8-associated proteins or other regulatory regions of the motor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".