Strut‐and‐tie model for column‐to‐drilled shaft connections in reinforced concrete bridge columns subjected to lateral loads
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Drilled shafts with a larger diameter than columns are frequently adopted as the foundation of highway bridge columns due to their superior economic efficiency and lower impact on existing facilities in the urban built‐up area. Different section dimensions lead to a socket connection between the column and the oversized shaft and a noncontact lap splice of their longitudinal bars. The force‐transfer mechanism and failure process of column‐to‐drilled shaft connections were deeply revealed in this study. Detailed FE models were developed at the Diana platform and validated against previous experimental results. Subsequently, a parametric study investigated the effect of the shear span‐to‐depth ratio, diameter ratio of shaft‐to‐column, column embedment depth, and shaft stirrup ratio. Finally, a modified strut‐and‐tie model (STM) was proposed to design stirrups of the transition region efficiently considering the experimental failure mechanism. Results indicate that the numerical models built in the Diana platform can precisely simulate the mechanical behavior of column‐to‐drilled shaft connections. The failure mechanism of column‐to‐drilled shaft connections is shaft stirrups yield at the compressive side induced by extrusion between the embedded column and shaft. The lateral loading capacity of column‐to‐drilled shaft connections increases with the increase of shear span‐to‐depth ratio, diameter ratio of shaft‐to‐column, column embedment depth, and shaft stirrup ratio. The modified STM is able to reveal the variation tendency of shaft transverse reinforcement demand with the various design parameters and give an average stirrup stress ratio of 1.20 and a coefficient of variation of only 8.31%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it