MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402326491 · doi:10.1177/08465371241278523

Association Between Cardiac Size, Systolic Function, and Complications in Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

2024· article· en· W4402326491 on OpenAlexafffund
Aly Fawzy, William Warnica, Kate Hanneman, Rachel M. Wald, Erwin Oechslin, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, Gauri Rani Karur

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Association of Radiologists Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkToronto General HospitalMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto
KeywordsMedicineEhlers–Danlos syndromeCardiologyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) is a rare and aggressive heritable aortic disease caused by pathogenic variants in COL3A1 gene, characterized by spontaneous arterial dissection and organ rupture. The purpose of this study is to evaluate ventricular size and function and to explore their associations with complications in vEDS. Methods: Adults with genetically confirmed vEDS who underwent clinical cardiac MRI were retrospectively compared with controls matched for age and sex. Cardiac MRI analysis included assessment of ventricular volumetry and arterial vasculature. vEDS-related complications were evaluated including dissection, aneurysm, and pneumothorax. Multivariable logistic regression was performed. Results: We studied 26 individuals with vEDS (38.6 ± 15.6 years, 50.0% female) and 26 healthy controls. Median clinical follow-up was 2.4 (1.1-3.6) years. Left and right ventricular ejection fractions were lower in vEDS compared with controls (LVEF 58 ± 6% vs 61 ± 4%, P = .03; RVEF 54 ± 5% vs 58 ± 4%, P = .03). After controlling for age, sex, and antihypertensive medication, LV end-diastolic volume indexed to body surface area (LVEDVi) predicted dissections (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01-1.2, P = .04) and aneurysms (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01-1.3, P = .03). Indexed LV end systolic volume (LVESVi) also predicted aneurysms (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.03-1.5, P = .02). LVEF predicted the presence of any complication (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.99, P = .04). Pneumothorax occurred exclusively in vEDS group among those with LVEF <58% (below the mean), 50.0% versus 0.0%, P = .02. Those with LVEF <58% had more frequent dissection and/or aneurysm (75.0% vs 12.5%, P = .04). Conclusion: Lower LVEF and larger cardiac size are associated with complications in vEDS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Association of Radiologists JournalSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207