MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402327130 · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2024.111611

Portable cell imprinted polymer-based microfluidic sensor for bacteria detection in real water

2024· article· en· W4402327130 on OpenAlex
Ali Doostmohammadi, Hongsheng Huang, Sohail Naushad, Pouya Rezai

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrochemical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiosensors and Analytical Detection
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection AgencyYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicrofluidicsMolecularly imprinted polymerNanotechnologyBacteriaPolymerMaterials scienceChemistryBiologySelectivityBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Cell imprinted polymer (CIP) microfluidic sensor for bacteria detection in water. • CIP-coated microparticles synthesized and used within the microfluidic device. • Sensor limits of detection at 8 × 10 3 CFU/mL and quantification at 6 × 10 5 CFU/mL. • Sensor specificity to E. coli confirmed using non-specific Salmonella and Sarcina. • Compared to lab-based method, sensor similarly quantified bacteria in pond water. Cell-imprinted polymer (CIP) based optical biosensors have transformed point-of-care detection. However, challenges remain in their portability and detection sensitivity, time, and cost. Herein, we present an imprinted polymer-based low-cost microfluidic device integrated into a portable enclosure that enables rapid and sensitive bacteria detection in real water. A portable 3D-printed platform was custom-designed, housing all essential detection components, i.e., pumping and fluorescent imaging units and the microfluidic sensor. CIP coated magnetic microparticles (MPs) with affinity to bacteria were manipulated inside the magnetophoretic microfluidic device at an optimized flow rate of 0.01 mL/min for bacteria capturing. Fluorescent imaging pre- and post-bacteria capture facilitated quantification of fluorescence intensity changes as bacteria were trapped by the CIP-MPs. The sensor’s dose–response curve established limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) at 8 × 10 3 and 6 × 10 5 CFU/mL, respectively, within a dynamic range of 10 3 to 10 9 CFU/mL. It specifically detected E. coli , distinguishing it from non-specific bacteria like Salmonella and Sarcina . In real pond water tests, our sensor detected 2 × 10⁶ CFU/mL, matching a central lab’s result of 2.33 × 10⁶ CFU/mL, demonstrating its effectiveness for real-water monitoring. While further enhancements are needed for improving the specificity in complex environmental matrices and broader bacterial strain detection, the sensor’s simplicity and portability highlight its potential for practical potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it