MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402334165 · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2024.104105

Point cloud semantic segmentation with adaptive spatial structure graph transformer

2024· article· en· W4402334165 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ting Han, Yiping Chen, Jin Ma, Xiaoxue Liu, Wuming Zhang, Xinchang Zhang, Huajuan Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceSun Yat-sen UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPoint cloudSegmentationCartographyGeographyGraphComputer scienceTransformerArtificial intelligenceData scienceTheoretical computer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid development of LiDAR and artificial intelligence technologies, 3D point cloud semantic segmentation has become a highlight research topic . This technology is able to significantly enhance the capabilities of building information modeling , navigation and environmental perception . However, current deep learning-based methods primarily rely on voxelization or multi-layer convolution for feature extraction. These methods often face challenges in effectively differentiating between homogeneous objects or structurally adherent targets in complex real-world scenes. To this end, we propose a Graph Transformer point cloud semantic segmentation network (ASGFormer) tailored for structurally adherent objects. Firstly, ASGFormer combines Graph and Transformer to promote global correlation understanding in the graph. Secondly, spatial index and position embedding are constructed based on distance relationships and feature differences. Through a learnable mechanism, the structural weights between points are dynamically adjusted, achieving adaptive spatial structure within the graph. Finally, dummy nodes are introduced to facilitate global information storage and transmission between layers, effectively addressing the issue of information loss at the terminal nodes of the graph. Comprehensive experiments are conducted on the various real-world 3D point cloud datasets, analyzing the effectiveness of proposed ASGFormer through qualitative and quantitative evaluations . ASGFormer outperforms existing approaches with of 91.3% for OA, 78.0% for mAcc, and 72.3% for mIoU on S3DIS dataset. Moreover, ASGFormer achieves 72.8%, 45.5%, 81.6%, 70.1% mIoU on ScanNet, City-Facade, Toronto 3D and Semantic KITTI dataset, respectively. Notably, the proposed method demonstrates effective differentiation of homogeneous structurally adherent objects, further contributing to the intelligent perception and modeling of complex scenes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207