Connecting genomic and proteomic signatures of amyloid burden in the brain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has a high heritable component characteristic of complex diseases, yet many of the genetic risk factors remain unknown. We combined genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on amyloid endophenotypes measured in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) as surrogates of amyloid pathology, which may be helpful to understand the underlying biology of the disease. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of GWAS of CSF Aβ42 and PET measures combining six independent cohorts (n=2,076). Due to the opposite effect direction of Aβ phenotypes in CSF and PET measures, only genetic signals in the opposite direction were considered for analysis (n=376,599). Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were calculated and evaluated for AD status and amyloid endophenotypes. We then searched the CSF proteome signature of brain amyloidosis using SOMAscan proteomic data (Ace cohort, n=1,008) and connected it with GWAS results of loci modulating amyloidosis. Finally, we compared our results with a large meta-analysis using publicly available datasets in CSF (n=13,409) and PET (n=13,116). This combined approach enabled the identification of overlapping genes and proteins associated with amyloid burden and the assessment of their biological significance using enrichment analyses. Results After filtering the meta-GWAS, we observed genome-wide significance in the rs429358- APOE locus and nine suggestive hits were annotated. We replicated the APOE loci using the large CSF-PET meta-GWAS and identified multiple AD-associated genes as well as the novel GADL1 locus. Additionally, we found a significant association between the AD PRS and amyloid levels, whereas no significant association was found between any Aβ PRS with AD risk. CSF SOMAscan analysis identified 1,387 FDR-significant proteins associated with CSF Aβ42 levels. The overlap among GWAS loci and proteins associated with amyloid burden was very poor (n=35). The enrichment analysis of overlapping hits strongly suggested several signalling pathways connecting amyloidosis with the anchored component of the plasma membrane, synapse physiology and mental disorders that were replicated in the large CSF-PET meta-analysis. Conclusions The strategy of combining CSF and PET amyloid endophenotypes GWAS with CSF proteome analyses might be effective for identifying signals associated with the AD pathological process and elucidate causative molecular mechanisms behind the amyloid mobilization in AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".