Molecular basis for CSB stimulation of the SNM1A DNA repair nuclease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Cockayne Syndrome B (CSB, ERCC6 ) protein, interacts with the exonuclease SNM1A during transcription-coupled DNA interstrand (ICL) repair, with CSB facilitating localisation of SNM1A to ICL damage. The functional and mechanistic details of this interaction in DNA repair, however, have not been defined. Here, we demonstrate that CSB enhances SNM1A resection through ICLs and identify a specific interaction between the winged-helix domain of CSB and the nuclease core of SNM1A that is crucial for recruitment and enhancement of nuclease degradation. Biochemical and single-molecule studies on DNA containing site-specific ICLs reveal that CSB increases the affinity of SNM1A to damaged DNA substrates and also alters the substrate conformation to enhance ICL processing by SNM1A. Notably, CSB was observed preferentially as a dimer when colocalised with SNM1A at ICLs, constrasting with its monomeric nature observed during repair initiation in classical transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair. The combined results provide molecular insights into the basis of a direct contribution of CSB to a DNA repair reaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".