MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402338785 · doi:10.1101/2024.09.03.611105

Session duration affects the magnitude of post-exercise hypervolemia but not the erythropoietin response to acute high-intensity interval exercise

2024· preprint· en· W4402338785 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas R. Tripp, A.M. Caswell, Brittany A. Edgett, Martin J. MacInnis

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypervolemiaDuration (music)Session (web analytics)MedicineErythropoietinIntensity (physics)Physical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCardiologyInternal medicineBlood volumeComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The increase in plasma volume ∼24 hours post-exercise may act as an erythropoietic signal, but this mechanism’s responsiveness to different exercise prescription variables is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of high-intensity interval exercise duration on plasma volume and related responses. On separate days, 16 healthy, recreationally active participants (n=8 males; n=8 females) performed four (4×4) or eight intervals (8×4) consisting of 4 min at 105% critical power with 3 min recovery. Venous blood samples collected before, immediately after, and 24 hours after each HIIT session were used to measure hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit to calculate plasma volume changes. Erythropoietic and plasma volume regulating hormone concentrations were measured using ELISA kits. Plasma volume decreased immediately after both protocols (4×4: −4.4±3.5%, p<0.05; 8×4: −4.4±3.6%, p<0.05) but was only significantly elevated above baseline 24 hours after the 8×4 protocol (4×4: +1.0±7.1%, p>0.05; 8×4: +5.6±4.6%, p<0.05). Erythropoietin concentration ([EPO]) was higher than baseline 24 hours after the HIIT protocols (4×4: Pre vs 24 h post: 6.5±3.1 vs. 7.1±3.3 mIU/mL; 8×4: 6.9±3.7 vs. 7.3±3.7 mIU/mL; main effect of time, p<0.05) with no difference between protocols (p>0.05). [Aldosterone] was elevated immediately post-exercise after both protocols (4×4: Pre vs 0 h post: 295±151 vs. 544±259 pg/mL; 8×4: 335±235 vs. 821±553 pg/mL), but the 8×4 protocol caused a larger increase (interaction effect, p<0.05). That post-exercise hypervolemia may be exercise duration-dependent but is not required for increases in circulating EPO has important implications for endurance training aiming to increase oxygen delivery to active tissues. NEWS AND NOTEWORTHY This study is the first to show that both a common HIIT protocol length (4 x 4 min) and an extended HIIT protocol (8 x 4 min) similarly increased [erythropoietin] 24 h after exercise, despite only the extended protocol transiently increasing plasma volume. Previous works have investigated plasma volume regulation following different HIIT durations, but not explored links to erythropoietic signalling. This study’s findings have relevance for understanding the physiology of exercise-induced erythropoiesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicCardiovascular and exercise physiology→French-language works237,207→