MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402339569 · doi:10.15574/hw.2024.172.72

Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a review of modern opportunities

2024· review· en· W4402339569 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
E.V. Petrenko, Larysa Bondarenko

Bibliographic record

VenueUKRAINIAN JOURNAL HEALTH OF WOMAN · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNauseaVomitingPregnancyObstetricsMedicineAnesthesiaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) are the most frequent and characteristic symptoms of pregnancy for the first trimester that potentially may cause substantial negative consequences for the physical and emotional health of a woman. According to various studies, from 50 to 90% of women suffer from NVP. Usually, the symptoms of NVP begin at 5-6 weeks after the last menstrual period and disappear in most cases by the 16th-20th week of pregnancy, but sometimes they persist and may be observed until the third trimester, and in rare cases - even until childbirth. The doctor's main task in providing assistance to a pregnant woman with NVP is the timely application of an adequate treatment strategy, both effective and safe for a mother and a fetus, as well as ensuring the highest achievable life quality for a woman. The aim of this article is to analyze modern management opportunities for pregnant women with NVP, including an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment strategies, for a comprehensive understanding of the NVP problem and the main principles and ways for solving it. This review is based on national guidelines (updated Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) Green-top clinical guideline 2024, Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC) Guideline 2016), the results of various studies, and review articles (database of the Cochrane Library, UpToDate, EMBASE, MEDLINE). Conclusion: a combination of pyridoxine and doxylamine can be prescribed for the prevention of NVP since the diagnosis of pregnancy in a high-risk group of women. In case of already existing symptoms of NVP, the objective assessment of complaints, as well as a response to the prescribed therapy, are facilitated by the unified scales. In most cases, lifestyle modification and first-line drug therapy effectively reduce the severity of NVP symptoms and improve a woman's quality of life. In case of insufficient response, other drugs are added to the treatment regimen, including second and third-line drugs, with a consideration of possible drug interactions. Some patients might need admission, and in addition to antiemetic therapy, they might need intravenous rehydration, electrolyte balance restoration, and thromboprophylaxis. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.216
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUKRAINIAN JOURNAL HEALTH OF WOMANSame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207