MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402350643 · doi:10.33137/q.i..v44i2.43863

Le declinazioni del genere delle memorie di famiglia nella scrittura autobiografica di Goliarda Sapienza

2024· article· it· W4402350643 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Francesca Nieddu

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaderni d italianistica · 2024
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicItalian Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’ibridazione letteraria del romanzo di formazione con quello di famiglia (Abignente 2017, 2021; Lucamante 2022) rappresenta il fulcro del presente articolo che ragiona sulla presenza della famiglia intesa come necessaria “Altra” della scrittura autobiografica di Goliarda Sapienza. Del corpus chiamato dall’autrice l’“Autobiografia delle contraddizioni” si prendono in esame alcune tappe quali Lettera aperta (1967), Il filo di mezzogiorno (1969), Io, Jean Gabin (2010, post.) e “Lettera aperta III” (2011, post.), in cui l’autrice ricompone la memoria personale e familiare, inizialmente compromessa dalla terapia per elettroshock, ripensandosi all’interno della “tribù Sapienza-Giudice.” Si esaminano alcune funzioni autoriali del genere delle memorie di famiglia attraverso la lettura di alcune pagine edite dei taccuini che raccontano il travagliato iter di scrittura del romanzo inedito Amore sotto il fascismo (1989–1994) e il tema delle origini familiari viene approfondito nella sua natura intermediale nell’opera Io, Jean Gabin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaderni d italianisticaSame topicItalian Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207