MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402358803 · doi:10.1002/uog.29019

EP24.12: Prevalence of adenomyosis and endometriosis on ultrasound among symptomatic patients stratified by referring physician

2024· article· en· W4402358803 on OpenAlexaff
Tsung‐Hsien Lin, K. McGowan, Mathew Leonardi

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometriosis Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdenomyosisEndometriosisMedicineUltrasoundObstetricsGeneral surgeryGynecologyRadiologyDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To determine the prevalence rates of adenomyosis and endometriosis among symptomatic patients referred for ultrasounds according to referral sources: primary general practitioners, general gynecologists, and specialist gynecologists in minimally invasive surgery (MIGS). This is a retrospective cross-sectional study across a single community outpatient ultrasound centre. Each patient underwent a transvaginal ultrasound by a skilled gynecologist sonologist with systematic evaluation of the pelvis using the international Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) standards for assessment of adenomyosis and endometriosis. A total of 151 patient underwent assessment, of which 32.9% and 66.2% were diagnosed with adenomyosis and endometriosis respectively. The prevalence of adenomyosis and overall endometriosis in those referred by general practitioners was 30.8% and 74.1%. In this group, 48.1% was diagnosed with superficial endometriosis, 30.0% with deep endometriosis, and 11.1% with ovarian endometriosis. Among patients referred by a general gynecologist, 40.4% had adenomyosis and 63.3% had endometriosis, of which superficial endometriosis was the most common at 38.8%. In those referred by a MIGS, 28.6% had findings of adenomyosis and 65.3% had endometriosis. Deep endometriosis was most prevalent among those referred by MIGS at 50.7%. Most symptomatic patients referred for endometriosis assessment were diagnosed with endometriosis with transvaginal ultrasound, irrespective of referring physician speciality. Among those referred by general practitioners and gynecologists, superficial endometriosis emerged as the predominate subtype diagnosed. This highlights the importance of non-invasive diagnostic methods while emphasising the role of general practitioners in guiding triage between referral to a general gynecologist or MIGS based on ultrasound findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicEndometriosis Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207