MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402358958 · doi:10.1002/uog.29033

EP24.26: Using the IDEA consensus ‘pulling sleeve’ sign to guide surgical decisions

2024· article· en· W4402358958 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Shishkina, Ido Mick, M. Marien, Mathew Leonardi

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Simulation and Training
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSign (mathematics)Computer scienceMedicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) has a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 97% for detecting of bowel endometriosis (BE). When surgery is decided, a choice between shaving technique (ST), disc resection or segmental resection is needed, making preoperative TVS crucial. The six descriptors of BE as per the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group have not proven to be useful in guiding surgical decisions. We hypothesise that the ‘pulling sleeve’ sign (PSS) is a good predictor of when to use a ST. Iterative TVS and laparoscopic surgery enhanced our understanding of this particular form of BE. We present PSS as seen on TVS and the surgical correlation. On TVS, we can appreciate the outer longitudinal muscularis layer involvement with preservation of the inner circular muscularis layer (CML). This critical landmarking can be used in surgical planning when considering ST, as this is the least invasive technique with lowest complication rates. The PSS indicates a triangular-shaped BE nodule that also yields an extrinsic reaction, focally ethering the bowel (see figure 1). We have generally noted a preserved hyperechoic line in the muscularis propria demarcating the longitudinal and circular layers (see figure 2). Preservation of this line suggests integrity of CML, enabling a ST without enterotomy as an appropriate surgical approach. An accompanying videoclip will showcase preoperative TVS findings of PSS and laparoscopic footage of BE shaving excision (see figure 3). If the hyperechoic line is not preserved, this indicates involvement of CML, which likely suggests the BE lesion might not be amenable to the ST. Further studies are needed to evaluate reliability and accuracy of this sign for predicting a ST. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicSurgical Simulation and TrainingFrench-language works237,207