MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402371396 · doi:10.3390/info15090552

Understanding Telehealth Adoption among the Elderly: An Empirical Investigation

2024· article· en· W4402371396 on OpenAlexaff
Urvashi Tandon, Myriam Ertz, Muhammed Sajid, Mehrdad Kordi

Bibliographic record

VenueInformation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTechnology Use by Older Adults
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelehealthEmpirical researchBusinessTelemedicinePsychologyHealth careEconomicsEconomic growthMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The adoption of telemedicine among the elderly is vital due to their unique healthcare needs and growing engagement with technology. This study explores the factors influencing their adoption behaviors, identifying both facilitating and inhibiting elements. While previous research has examined these factors, few have empirically assessed the simultaneous influence of barriers and enablers using a sample of elderly individuals. Using behavioral reasoning theory (BRT), this research investigates telehealth adoption behaviors of the elderly in India. A conceptual model incorporates both “reasons for” and “reasons against” adopting telehealth, capturing the nuanced dynamics of adoption behaviors. Data from 375 elderly individuals were collected to validate the model through structural equation modeling. The findings reveal that openness to change significantly enhances attitudes towards telehealth and “reasons for” adoption, influencing behaviors. This research contributes to the healthcare ecosystem by improving the understanding of telehealth adoption among the elderly. It validates the impact of openness to change alongside reasons for and against adoption, refining the understanding of behavior. By addressing impediments and leveraging facilitators, this study suggests strategies to maximize telehealth usage among the elderly, particularly those who are isolated, improving their access to medical services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInformationSame topicTechnology Use by Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207