MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402371498 · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01903-7

Defining and pursuing diversity in human genetic studies

2024· article· en· W4402371498 on OpenAlexaff
Maili Raven-Adams, Tina Hernandez‐Boussard, Yann Joly, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Subhashini Chandrasekharan, Adrian Thorogood, Judit Kumuthini, Calvin Wai-Loon Ho, Ariana Gonzlez, Sarah C. Nelson, Yvonne Bombard, Donrich Thaldar, Hanshi Liu, Alessia Costa, Vijaytha Muralidharan, Sasha Henriques, Jamal Nasir, Aimé Lumaka, Beatrice Kaiser, Saumya Shekhar Jamuar, Anna Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Genetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRace, Genetics, and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoTerry Fox Research InstituteMcGill Genome Centre
FundersNational Human Genome Research InstituteU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
KeywordsBiologyDiversity (politics)Evolutionary biologyHuman genetic variationComputational biologyGenetic diversityGeneticsHuman genomeGenomeGeneAnthropologyDemographyPopulationSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.081
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.091
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0810.091
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.036
Scholarly communication0.0090.014
Open science0.0030.019
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature GeneticsSame topicRace, Genetics, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207