Breaking the CO2 Gridlock: Can Renewables Lead the Way for the OECD?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of low-carbon energy in power grids is essential for minimizing negative effects on the environment. Energy consumption causes environmental damage to the OECD’s economy. This study aims to investigate the effect of energy consumption, population, and GDP on CO2 emissions using panel data from 17 OECD countries over the period 2000–2023. We use regression approaches, such as partial least squares and principal components, to study the effects of GDP, urban and total population, oil and nuclear use, renewable energy, and industrialization on CO2 emissions. The regression process in this study reduces the data to a two-dimensional representation using a stochastic model and estimation techniques. The findings of this empirical investigation indicate that the United States, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Korea, Mexico, and the United Kingdom exhibit higher levels of primary energy consumption in comparison to value-added sectors, renewable–geothermal energy, and nuclear energy. We determined the effects of CO2 emissions, GDP, and energy consumption by considering these as the most significant elements. This has made it possible to reduce CO2 emissions by focusing one’s attention and energy on the development of novel technologies, the use of renewable energy sources, and the execution of strategic plans. Attracting increasing attention are technological shifts that deliver enormous quantities of clean energy to combat climate change. Findings from this study can help environmentalists and policymakers better understand the role of structural change and energy consumption processes in the globalization process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".