Frequency of Grade III Knee Osteoarthritis among Women in Gujranwala Pakistan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To ascertain the prevalence of Grade (III) osteoarthritis (OA) in the knees among women in Gujranwala, Pakistan. Method: The cross-sectional study was carried out over the course of six months (January 2023–July 2023) at the orthopedic outpatient program at Gujranwala Teaching Hospital. This study used a 100-person sample size. The Inclusion Criteria is Women between the ages of 55 and 70 who had Grade (III) knee osteoarthritis were included. Additionally, women with a history of cancer are eliminated, as are women who did not provide us with their consent. The method of convenient sampling was applied. Data was gathered through the use of McMaster and Western Ontario Universities. Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC). Data analysis was done with SPSS version 21. Results: The study's findings indicate that the participants' mean age was 53.8 + 6.024. 10% (10) of the 100 individuals indicated that they had no pain when walking. 17% indicated slight PAIN, 33% indicated mild pain while walking, 27% reported moderate pain and 24% reported severe pain. Twelve percent of the 100 individuals indicated that they have no pain when climbing stairs. (13) 13% reported slight pain (24) 24% reported moderate pain, and so on. When climbing stairs, 26% reported severe pain. Conclusion: The study's conclusion was that women experienced knee pain quite frequently. Many tasks of daily living, such as getting out of bed, lying down, using the restroom, or bending down, are made difficult by chronic knee pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".