Minor Ailments and Pharmacist Management in Ontario, Canada: Attachment and Primary Care
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Minor ailments (MA) are health conditions that can be managed with minimal prescribed treatment and/or self-care strategies. In Ontario, Canada, pharmacists were given authority to deliver service for thirteen MAs on January 1, 2023, with an additional six MAs on October 1, 2023. This study aims to identify patterns of MA service provision and describe characteristics of recipients of MA services. A cross-sectional analysis of linked health administrative data, including pharmacist billing for MA services, patient demographics, and physician and hospital billing data, was conducted. Delivery of MA services prescribed in Ontario from January 1 to December 31, 2023 were analyzed with key demographics (age, sex, income, new arrival status, comorbidity), health care utilization (ED, hospitalization) and primary care attachment. In 2023, 547,673 (3.6%) Ontario residents received at least one MA service, with the top 5 services being urinary tract infections (199,282), conjunctivitis (153,021), herpes labialis (46,659), allergic rhinitis (41,521), and dermatitis (39,365). Compared to all Ontario residents, the MA service recipients were more likely to be people with a higher rate of ED visits (41.7% vs. 32.4%), comorbidities (17.5% vs. 9.7%), higher incomes (highest income quintile, 23.1% vs. 20.1%; lowest income quintile, 16.5% vs. 19.4%), and hospitalizations (23.6% vs. 17.6%), and less likely to be newcomers to Ontario (8.7% vs. 13.1%). They were more likely to be attached to a primary care provider (91.3% vs. 84.7%). This study provides insight into early users of this program, and sheds light on those with systemic vulnerabilities and equity deserving groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".