Three Subtypes of Autism Spectrum Disorder with Transcriptomic Signatures Derived from Morphometric Similarity Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a prevalent and highly heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorder. Previous studies have attempted to identify ASD subgroups by analyzing isolated cortical structural features. However, these studies have not considered the relationship between multiple structural features, which provide information on the structural organization of the brain. Morphometric similarity network (MSN), a structural brain network contributed by multiple anatomical features (gray matter volume, mean cortical thickness, surface area, mean curvature, Gaussian curvature, curvature index, and fold index), strongly relates to cytoarchitectonic and genomic measures of histological similarity between cortical areas. We applied K-means clustering on MSN from 236 individuals with ASD and identified three subtypes. Subtype-1 showed relatively similar MSN values with typically developmental individuals (TD). Subtype-2 showed higher morphometric similarities in the lateral frontal and temporal cortical regions and lower in anterior prefrontal and occipital regions compared to TD. These patterns were the opposite in subtype-3. Behaviorally, subtype-3 had more severe verbal and social deficits compared to subtype-2. The weaker resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) between the language and salience networks was observed between subtype-2 and TD. Subtype-3 had stronger rs-FC between salience and default mode networks (DMN), between frontoparietal and visual networks, and between language and dorsal attention networks, while weaker rs-FC within DMN, within sensorimotor, and within salience networks. In addition, genes with expression patterns associated with regional MS changes in ASD subtypes were functionally enriched in neuron-specific biological processes related to nervous system development, synaptic signaling and chromatin organization. These genes were particularly enriched in GABAergic neurons, glutamatergic neurons, astrocytes and microglia. Taken together, our findings suggest the existence of different neuroanatomical subtypes based on multiple anatomical features in ASD with distinct transcriptomic signatures and functional connectome patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".