Increasing prevalence of plant-fungal symbiosis across two centuries of environmental change
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Species' distributions and abundances are shifting in response to climate change. Most species harbor microbial symbionts that have the potential to influence these responses. Mutualistic microbial symbionts may provide resilience to environmental change by protecting their hosts from increasing stress. However, environmental change that disrupts these interactions may lead to declines in hosts or symbionts. Microbes preserved within herbarium specimens offer a unique opportunity to quantify changes in microbial symbiosis across broad temporal and spatial scales. We asked how the prevalence of seed-transmitted fungal symbionts of grasses (Epichloe endophytes), which can protect hosts from abiotic stress, have changed over time in response to climate change, and how these changes vary across host species' ranges. Specifically, we analyzed 2,346 herbarium specimens of three grass host species collected over the last two centuries (1824 -- 2019) for the presence or absence of endophyte symbiosis, and evaluated spatial and temporal trends in endophyte prevalence. We found that endophytes increased in prevalence over the last two centuries from ca. 25% prevalence to ca. 75% prevalence, on average, across three host species. We also found that changes in prevalence were associated with observed changes in seasonal climate drivers; notably increasing precipitation corresponding to each host species' peak growing season and changes in off-peak season variability in precipitation. Our analysis performed favorably in an out-of-sample predictive test with contemporary data, however we identified greater local-scale variability in endophyte prevalence in contemporary data compared to historic data, suggesting that model fusion may be an important step moving forward. Our results provide novel evidence for a cryptic biological response to climate change that may contribute to the resilience of host-microbe symbiosis through context-dependent benefits that confer a fitness advantage to symbiotic hosts under environmental change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".