Using linked administrative data to describe a cohort of young people who have a parent with a history of homelessness (Study 1)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ObjectiveLittle is known about the children of parents who experience homelessness. The At Home/Chez Soi (AHCS) Research Demonstration Project, launched in 2009, was a Canadian multi-site, multi-year study that tested the effectiveness of Housing First. In Winnipeg, 513 people were enrolled, of whom 47% were parents. Our objective was to determine how the children were faring with respect to their health and social situations at a time their parent was experiencing homelessness. ApproachThe cohort, created using the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy’s familial linkage methodology, consisted of 405 individuals (< 30 years old) who were the offspring of the Winnipeg AHCS cohort. We descriptively summarized the socioeconomic characteristics and indicators of their involvement (or lack thereof) in various government systems at or in a period up to their parent’s study enrolment date. ResultsApproximately half of the cohort were female (51%) and under 13 years (52%). Most (76%) resided in a household that had received income assistance. At least 50% had been placed into care at or near birth and only 17% had not been involved with the child welfare system. Of those school aged, 81% were enrolled in school and of those older than school aged, 53% had graduated. Nearly half (49%) had been diagnosed with a mental health disorder and/or with asthma (47%). Conclusions and ImplicationsThis study is the first in a series seeking to identify ways to prevent multigenerational experiences of homelessness. Findings will generate valuable insights for upstream intervention across various systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".