MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402406118 · doi:10.5435/jaaos-d-24-00548

How Do We Improve Sleep Quality After Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

2024· review· en· W4402406118 on OpenAlexaff
Pravarut Nithagon, Sanjeev Rampam, Terence L. Thomas, Graham S. Goh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsObject Research Systems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexEpworth Sleepiness ScaleRandomized controlled trialPhysical therapyPerioperativePsychological interventionArthroplastyMEDLINEPolysomnographyAnesthesiaInsomniaSleep qualitySurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of sleep for physiological function, rehabilitation, and recovery, sleep quality after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains poor. The objective of this systematic review was to identify, summarize, and evaluate postoperative interventions aimed at improving sleep quality after TJA. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed (MEDLINE) and Scopus (Embase, MEDLINE, COMPENDEX) from inception to April 2024 was conducted (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023447317). Randomized controlled trials on interventions to improve sleep quality were included. Sleep outcomes, including the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Sleep Disturbance, Numeric Rating Scale sleep scores,l9 were extracted. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the available data. RESULTS: Of the 1,549 articles identified, seven randomized trials with a total of 840 patients were included (394 total hip arthroplasties [THA], 446 total knee arthroplasties [TKA]). Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was the most commonly used outcome for assessing sleep quality. Among THA studies, zolpidem, combined fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) and dexmedetomidine (DEX), and perioperative methylprednisolone were shown to markedly improve postoperative sleep quality. Neither topical cannabidiol nor topical essential oil was found to improve postoperative sleep quality after TKA. Melatonin had no effect on sleep outcomes after TJA. CONCLUSION: Zolpidem, FICB + DEX, and perioperative methylprednisolone are effective interventions to improve sleep quality after THA. Topical cannabis, topical essential oil, and melatonin did not improve sleep quality. No effective sleep interventions for TKA patients were identified. Improving sleep quality remains a potential therapeutic goal to improve patient satisfaction after TJA. Continued investigation on this topic is therefore necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.090
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.090
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.014
Bibliometrics0.0090.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207