Effect of quantitative consciousness index on seizure parameters during electroconvulsive therapy in patients with major depressive disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is both an effective treatment for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and a noxious stimulus. Although some studies have explored the effect of sedation depth on seizure parameters in ECT, there is little research on the noxious stimulation response to ECT. In this study, we used two electroencephalography (EEG)-derived indices, the quantitative consciousness (qCON) index and quantitative nociceptive (qNOX) index, to monitor sedation, hypnosis, and noxious stimulation response in patients with MDD undergoing acute ECT. AIM To evaluate the effect of anesthesia depth based on the qCON and qNOX indices on seizure parameters. METHODS Patients with MDD (n = 24) underwent acute bilateral temporal ECT under propofol anesthesia. Before ECT, the patients were randomly divided into three groups according to qCON scores (qCON60-70, qCON50-60, and qCON40-50). Continuous qCON monitoring was performed 3 minutes before and during ECT, and the qCON, qNOX, vital signs, EEG seizure parameters, and complications during the recovery period were recorded. The 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Zung’s Self-rating Depression Scale, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were evaluated before the first ECT session, after the fourth ECT session, and after the full course of ECT. RESULTS A total of 193 ECT sessions were performed on 24 participants. The qCON index significantly affected the EEG seizure duration, peak mid-ictal amplitude, and maximum heart rate during ECT (P < 0.05). The qNOX index significantly affected the post-ictal suppression index (P < 0.05). Age, number of ECT sessions, and anesthetic-ECT time intervals also had a significant effect on EEG seizure parameters (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in complications, 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores, Zung’s Self-rating Depression Scale scores, or Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores among the three groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Electrical stimulation at a qCON index of 60-70 resulted in better EEG seizure parameters without increasing complications in patients with MDD undergoing bilateral temporal ECT under propofol anesthesia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".