MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402423400 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp18026

Impacts of paternal latitudinal origin on herbivore response strategies in Lythrum salicaria

2024· article· en· W4402423400 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jessica Smuk, María José Gómez Quijano

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHerbivoreBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plants have evolved different strategies to withstand and respond to herbivore stress. The two main strategies plants employ under herbivore stress are known as tolerance and induced resistance. Tolerance is the ability to maintain high fitness despite experiencing high levels of herbivore damage. While induced resistance typically involves changing the concentrations of internal secondary metabolites as a response to initial herbivory and to prevent further damage. These strategies can lead to fitness differences between populations that vary by latitudinal origin. Previous studies have focused on the occurrence of herbivore response in general, whereas this study will make a direct comparison between response types and their fitness implications. Our study investigates whether eastern North American populations of Lythrum salicaria respond differently to herbivore stress. F1 crosses between L. salicaria individuals with different parental latitudinal ranges were grown in a common garden under two experimental herbivory treatments (pesticide sprayed vs. no pesticide) at the Queen’s University Biological Station. To identify differences in herbivore tolerance, we measured plant growth and development over 13 weeks and quantified herbivore damage, caused by the biocontrol beetle Galerucella calmariensis. A 48-hour feeding assay was then conducted to identify differences in herbivore resistance between populations. This assay provided beetles with a choice between young and old L. salicaria leaves from each experimental treatment. Our preliminary analysis of the feeding assay showed differences in leaf damage between parental lines. The initial analysis also showed that older leaves generally experienced more damage than younger leaves over the course of the 48-hour period. These results indicate population differences in herbivory stress response and differences in stress response effectiveness that varies with plant age. This experiment showed that L. salicaria individuals have varying degrees of herbivore stress response and effectiveness. However, further analysis that includes reproductive outputs and developmental differences will be completed to clearly identify the type of strategies L. salicaria populations with different parental latitudinal origins employ in response to herbivore damage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.186
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings→Same topicPlant and animal studies→French-language works237,207→