MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402423430 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp18009

Early Signs of Structure in Protostellar Disks

2024· article· en· W4402423430 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Lance Schonberg

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrobiologyAstrophysicsAstronomyPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protostellar disks—rotating disks of gas and dust around pre-fusion ignition young stars—are divided into four main classes: Class 0: the youngest class, still deeply embedded in their parent molecular clouds and accumulating mass, with a lifespan on the order of 100k years. Class I: still embedded in molecular clouds, characterized by strong infrared and radio emissions generated by the heat from the collapsing central protostar, with a typical lifespan of a few hundred thousand years. Class II: more evolved with decreased accretion rates and active planet formation. Lifespan on the order of 2-3 million years. Class III: low accretion rate debris (mostly dust) disks. Remnants of planetary formation process. Typical lifespan of several million years. Focusing on the youngest disks, Classes 0 and I, we are investigating how early structure begins to show in the form of gaps and rings, indicating potential future planet formation. We use high resolution and high sensitivity (sub)millimeter wavelength observations from the ALMA (Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array) interferometer. Having identified approximately 10,700 potential Class 0 or I disks in the ALMA archive, we make use of several specialized code packages designed to fit or examine individual disks from their frequency space visibility data rather than from images to build a step-by-step process taking the initial ALMA data and providing the decision-making ability to categorize the disks into four primary categories: Smooth, Structured, Further Investigation, Not Usable. Having used the summer term to build, streamline, and document the needed process, we report building an initial catalog of usable Class 0 and Class I sources that contains 36 individual objects, with 7 categorized as Smooth, 8 as having Structure, and 6 needing Further Investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207