Visible Light‐Switchable Lattice Oxygen Sites for Selective C−H and C(O)−C Bond Electrooxidation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Lattice‐oxygen is highly oxidizable, ideal for electrocatalytic C−H oxidation but insufficient alone for C(O)−C bond cleavage due to the non‐removable nature of lattice sites. Here, we present a visible light‐assisted electrochemical method of in situ formulating removable lattice‐oxygen sites in a nickel‐oxyhydroxide (ESE‐NiOOH) electrocatalyst. This catalyst efficiently converts aromatic alcohols and carbonyls with C(O)−C fragments from lignin and plastics into benzoic acids (BAs) with high yields (83–99 %). Without light irradiation, ESE‐NiOOH's intrinsic lattice‐oxygen is non‐removable and inert for C(O)−C bond cleavage. In situ characterizations show light‐induced lattice‐oxygen removal and regeneration via OH − refilling. Theoretical calculations identify the nucleophilic oxygen attack on ketone‐derived carbanion as a rate‐determining step, which can be remarkably facilitated by removable lattice‐oxygen to activate α ‐C−H bonds. As a proof‐of‐concept, an “electrochemical funnel” strategy is developed for high‐efficiency upgrading aromatic mixtures with C(O)−C moieties into BA with up to 94 % yield. This in situ removal‐regeneration approach for lattice sites opens an avenue for the tailored design of interfacial electrocatalysts to selectively upcycle waste carbon sources into valuable products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".