Cerebral white matter damage in patients with end-stage kidney disease associates with cognitive impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Damage to brain white matter often occurs in individuals with chronic kidney disease, which might be related to their cognitive decline. This study aims to investigate tract-specific white matter damage in patients with end-stage kidney disease by using fixel-based analysis. Methods Images of 31 end-stage kidney disease patients and 16 normal controls (aged: 61.1 ± 10.4 years; 11 men) were acquired from a 1.5T magnetic resonance scanner. The patients were subsequently divided into with normal cognition (N = 17, aged: 66.9 ± 7.2 years; 10 men) and cognitive impairment (N = 14, aged: 72.4 ± 9.4 years; 7 men). Cognitive assessment, and neurologic, hematologic and biochemical samples were collected. Fixel-based analysis was used to examine the tract-specific damage within white matter. Differences between groups were evaluated through connectivity-based fixel enhancement and non-parametric permutation testing. Correlation with biomarkers was conducted through general linear model. Significance was determined with family-wise error-corrected P-value <.05. Results Reduced fixel-based metrics were observed in specific tract located the cerebral peduncle, internal capsule, corpus callosum, fornix and superior corona radiata in patients when compared with normal controls, indicating a reduction in fiber content. The fibers crossing the corpus callosum and the fornix/stria terminalis are particularly vulnerable sites, which can be associated with the decrease in both Mini-Mental State Examination (R2 ranged between 0.420 and 0.556) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (R2 ranged between 0.425 and 0.509), as well as the plasma concentration of calcium (R2 ranged between 0.207 and 0.322). The plasma concentration of indoxyl sulfate was associated with the descending tracts from right posterior limb of internal capsule to cerebral peduncle (R2 ranged between 0.262 and 0.335). Conclusions Tract-specific white matter damage can be noticed in the patients with end-stage kidney disease, and could be associated with their cognitive decline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".