MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402433160 · doi:10.24252/jmw.v6i2.50001

Manajemen Asuhan Kebidanan Antenatal Care Pada Ny ”K” dengan Hiperemesis Gravidarum Tingkat I di Puskesmas Bara-Baraya Makassar

2024· article· id· W4402433160 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Nur Faiza Fahira, Sitti Saleha, Andi Dian Diarfah, Ferawati Taherong

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Midwifery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Quality and Satisfaction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pendahuluan Hiperemesis gravidarum adalah mual muntah yang berlebihan dan salah satu komplikasi kehamilan yang mempengaruhi status kesehatan ibu dan tumbuh kembang janin. Mual dan muntah merupakan gangguan yang paling sering di jumpai pada awal kehamilan yang diklasifikasikan dalam tiga tingkatan yakni tingkat I (ringan), tingkat II (sedang), tingkat III (berat). World health organization (WHO) (2015) melaporkan kasus ibu hamil yang mengalami hiperemesis gravidarum meningkat 30,1% insidennya terjadi di Swedia 0,3%, California 0,55 %, di Canada 0,8%, di China 10,8%, di Norwegia 0,9%, di Pakistan 2,2% dan di Turki 1,9% (Nurhidayanti, Sitti Saleha, Zelna Yuni Andriyani 2023). Metode Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melaksanakan Manajemen Asuhan Kebidana Antenatal pada ibu dengan Hiperemesis Gravidarum Tingkat I di Puskesmas Bara-Barayya Makassar. Studi kasus yang dilakukan pada Ny”K” yaitu sesuai dengan kebutuhan klien dan kewenangan bidan dengan melakukan manajemen asuhan kebidanan 7 langkah varney dan dokumentasi dalam bentuk SOAP. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Ny”K” dengan Hiperemesis Gravidarum Tingkat I mengungkapkan keluham mual muntah berlebihan dan nafsu makannya menurun disertai pusing dan nyeri ulu hati hingga menganggu aktivitasnya. Kesimpulan Setelah melakukan kunjugan rumah sebanyak 6 kali Ny”K” tidak lagi mengalami mual dan muntah, nafsu makanya kembali normal, keadaan umum baik, tingkat kesadaran composmentis, tanda-tanda vital dalam batas normal dan pada pemeriksaan fisik tidak ditemukan kelainan

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal MidwiferySame topicHealthcare Quality and SatisfactionFrench-language works237,207