MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402441637 · doi:10.1111/opo.13391

Automated visual acuity estimation by optokinetic nystagmus using a stepped sweep stimulus

2024· article· en· W4402441637 on OpenAlex
Jason Turuwhenua, Zaw LinTun, Mohammad Norouzifard, Misty Edmonds, Rebecca Findlay, Joanna Black, Benjamin Thompson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic and Physiological Optics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersHealth Research Council of New Zealand
KeywordsOptokinetic reflexAudiologyVisual acuityStimulus (psychology)OptometryMonocularEye movementMedicineOphthalmologyDiabetic retinopathyArtificial intelligencePsychologyComputer scienceDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose To describe an automatic system for objective measurement of visual acuity (VA) using optokinetic nystagmus (OKN). This pilot study tested the system's sensitivity and specificity for detecting reduced VA in healthy adults by comparing VA‐OKN to VA with an Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart (VA‐ETDRS). Methods Adult participants (age 30 ± 12 years) with either reduced VA ( n = 11, VA‐ETDRS > 0.20 logMAR) or normal VA ( n = 12, VA‐ETDRS ≤ 0.20 logMAR) completed monocular VA‐OKN measurements in each eye. The VA‐OKN stimulus was an array of drifting (5°/s) vanishing discs presented in descending/ascending size order (0.00–1.00 logMAR in 0.10 steps). The stimulus was stepped every 2 s, and 10 sweeps were shown per eye (five ascending and five descending). Eye‐tracking data determined when OKN activity ceased (descending sweep) or began (ascending sweep), which was used to determine VA‐OKN for each sweep. The estimates were averaged across sweeps to produce an automated VA‐OKN. The automated sweeps were then provided in randomised order to a reviewer blinded to the VA‐ETDRS findings who determined a final VA‐OKN for an eye. Results A single randomly selected eye from each observer was used for analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of VA‐OKN using the same 0.20 logMAR threshold as VA‐ETDRS was 100%. Comparisons between the VA‐OKN and VA‐ETDRS measures were made for participants in the reduced VA group. There was no significant difference between VA‐OKN and VA‐ETDRS ( p = 0.55) and the two measures produced comparable values ( r 2 = 0.84, 95% limits of agreement = 0.19 logMAR, intra‐class correlation coefficient = 0.90 [95% CI:0.68–0.97]). Conclusions Visual acuity using optokinetic nystagmus correctly identified a VA deficit in adults and for those with a VA deficit, VA‐OKN was strongly correlated with the gold‐standard clinical measure of VA. OKN is a promising method which has the potential for use in cognitively impaired adults and pre‐verbal children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.791

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it