Under pressure: inhibited sporophyte growth of the sugar kelp Saccharina latissima (Phaeophyceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Seaweed aquaculture, which takes place mostly in Asia, is a lucrative industry that is valued > US $9 billion. However, technological modifications are needed to ensure economic viability and growth of the seaweed aquaculture industry throughout Europe. While current research is investigating the use of certain mechanised processes in seaweed aquaculture, the impact of pressurised spraying of macroalgal cultures on subsequent growth remains unknown. Here, we aimed to determine the efficacy of a future mechanised seeding procedure by investigating how differing pressure treatments impact upon the growth and percentage cover of zoospores seeded onto twine in the hatchery, using the kelp Saccharina latissima as a model species. Zoospore solutions were subjected to pressures of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 bar, before being seeded on hatchery twine and left to grow for 7 weeks. We demonstrate that both percentage cover and sporophyte lengths for S. latissima are significantly reduced by ~ 22% and ~ 61%, respectively, when juvenile zoospores are subjected to increasing pressure from 1 to 5 bar. This indicates that minimal pressure in the use of mechanised hatchery techniques is optimal for growth of seaweed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".