MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Analysis of Digital Finance Transformation for the Haier Group

2024· article· en· W4402449669 on OpenAlexaff
Jiaqi Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Economics Management and Political Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Digital transformationFinanceFinancial servicesBusinessService (business)Business modelThe InternetEconomicsComputer scienceMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the development of the Internet economy today, the business scope of large enterprises has gradually expanded to cross-regional areas, and the development advantages of cross-regional enterprises have gradually become apparent, but at the same time, a series of management and decision-making problems have also arisen. To change the situation of increased costs and reduced efficiency in financial management and decision-making due to the expansion of enterprise scale and the establishment of additional branches, many large Chinese enterprises have begun to try digital finance transformation. Solving the current unclear path of digital finance transformation will help digital finance transformation to be rapidly promoted and implemented in more Chinese enterprises. This study analyzes the features of financial sharing service center (FSSC) in the stage of intelligent and the essence of digital finance transformation. Combined with the development history, organizational framework, operating mechanism and financial data analysis of the management model of Haier Group's FFSC, this research explains the path and future trend of digital finance transformation based on the financial sharing service model, shedding light on offering reference and lessons for the digital finance transformation of enterprises contemporarily.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Economics Management and Political SciencesSame topicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceFrench-language works237,207