Automated biventricular quantification in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot using a three-dimensional deep learning segmentation model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deep learning is the state-of-the-art approach for automated segmentation of the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images. However, these models have been mostly trained and validated using CMR datasets of structurally normal hearts or cases with acquired cardiac disease, and are therefore not well-suited to handle cases with congenital cardiac disease such as tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). We aimed to develop and validate a dedicated model with improved performance for LV and RV cavity and myocardium quantification in patients with repaired TOF. METHODS: We trained a three-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network (CNN) with 5-fold cross-validation using manually delineated end-diastolic (ED) and end-systolic (ES) short-axis image stacks obtained from either a public dataset containing patients with no or acquired cardiac pathology (n = 100), an institutional dataset of TOF patients (n = 96), or both datasets mixed. Our method allows for missing labels in the training images to accommodate for different ED and ES phases for LV and RV as is commonly the case in TOF. The best performing model was applied to all frames of a separate test set of TOF cases (n = 36) and ED and ES phases were automatically determined for LV and RV separately. The model was evaluated against the performance of a commercial software (suiteHEART®, NeoSoft, Pewaukee, Wisconsin, US). RESULTS: Training on the mixture of both datasets yielded the best agreement with the manual ground truth for the TOF cases, achieving a median Dice similarity coefficient of (93.8%, 89.8%) for LV cavity and of (92.9%, 90.9%) for RV cavity at (ED, ES) respectively, and of 80.9% and 61.8% for LV and RV myocardium at ED. The offset in automated ED and ES frame selection was 0.56 and 0.89 frames on average for LV and RV respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between our model and the commercial software for LV quantification (two-sided Wilcoxon signed rank test, p<5%), while RV quantification was significantly improved with our model achieving a mean absolute error of 12 ml for RV cavity compared to 36 ml for the commercial software. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a fully automatic segmentation and quantification approach for LV and RV, including RV mass, in patients with repaired TOF. Compared to a commercial software, our approach is superior for RV quantification indicating its potential in clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".