MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402455417 · doi:10.1080/14680777.2024.2400473

Porous feminism: leaking technologies and ambivalent attachments

2024· article· en· W4402455417 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Na

Bibliographic record

VenueFeminist Media Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Feminism, and Media
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminismAmbivalenceSociologyPolitical scienceAestheticsPsychologyArtGender studiesSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fears, for many, have been actualized during the global pandemic. Working through borders and geographical crossings, this article performs a constellation of my anxieties about race, culture, and academia. I explore what kinds of feminisms might leak through if we let ourselves fall into fear. Through autotheory, a way of theorizing from my life experience, I revisit domains of seemingly bygone issues of feminism through encounters of distress and unease, marked through the performance of public/private breastfeeding and pumping. I put tension on feminist configurations of materiality as they rub against my memories. Alongside this, I analyze the tactics offered by the video and performance works of Patty Chang. The article mobilizes Patty Chang work Milk Debt, which presents through performers pumping breastmilk while reciting solicited fears from people living across myriad geographies during COVID-19. I suggest my fears alongside Chang’s performances of fear agitate the ways in which colonialism, elitism, and racial power persist in feminist circles—these fears assemble what I call a porous feminism that enables unruly minoritized feminisms to leak through.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFeminist Media StudiesSame topicGender, Feminism, and MediaFrench-language works237,207