Invasive<i>Neisseria meningitidis</i>subtype C in gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: a systematic review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Outbreaks of invasive Neisseria meningitidis subtype C in networks of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (MSM) have been reported. We aimed to explore any factors seen in MSM with invasive N.meningitidis subtype C. Method We searched three bibliographical databases for manuscripts written in English exploring at least one factor seen in MSM with invasive N. meningitidis subtype C published up to May 2024. Following an initial search, removal of duplicates and abstract review, two authors independently reviewed full-text manuscripts and performed a risk of bias assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute toolkit. Narrative data were synthesised to generate themes. Results 16 manuscripts were included in this review from the USA (n=10), Germany (n=2), France (n=2), Canada (n=1) and Italy (n=1) and consisted of nine case series, four cross-sectional studies, two case reports and one case–control study published between 2003 and 2024 involving 236 MSM with invasive N. meningitidis subtype C, of which at least 64 died. We have highlighted some demographic (African-American or Hispanic identity in the USA, living with HIV), behavioural (kissing, sharing drinks, visiting sex-on-premises venues, visiting gay-oriented venues, using websites/mobile phone apps to meet sexual partners, recreational drug use, multiple and non-regular sexual partners) and infection (previous Chlamydia trachomatis, Treponema pallidum, Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Mpox) factors in MSM with invasive N. meningitidis subtype C. Conclusion These data serve as an important resource to inform and target future public health strategies and outbreak control measures for the prevention of invasive N. meningitidis subtype C in MSM. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024543551.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".