MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402479825 · doi:10.1201/9781003483755-467

An unconventional barrier design

2024· book-chapter· en· W4402479825 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zahra Kamranian, Diego Penate, Glen Norlander, Fadi Oudah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation Safety and Impact Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An industrial project in northern Canada was recently completed that required multiple ultra-heavy loads to be carried by the world’s largest mine trucks over a new bridge structure. The truck’s Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) was 6134 kN exceeding typical highway loads by more than 10 times. A rectangular concrete structure with two cells was selected as the most cost-effective option due to site constraints. The main access road consists of two single standard width traffic lanes travelling under the proposed bridge. Traffic on the access road is comprised of light vehicle traffic. The bridge overpass had three lanes, each with a 20 m wide diving lane. The span of the overpass was 71 meters. Highway bridge codes do not provide guidance for barrier design appropriate to restrain heavy haul trucks. Crash test results are not available for barriers capable of withstanding these loads. This presented challenges in structural analysis and design and in the design of safety components, including safety barriers. Therefore, the geometry of the barrier, the structural design, and the support of these barriers by the bridge superstructure required advanced modelling and design. As a safety requirement for the project, the oversize barriers are designed to redirect the heavy haul trucks in the event of a collision. Other challenges with this unique structure include rockfall simulation to model rock freefall for regular traffic below. Any debris generated on the overpass, including haul truck material, has the potential to free fall from the top haul truck boxes and impact light-duty vehicles travelling under the bridge on the highway traffic main access road. Stantec completed a quantitative rockfall simulation to mimic the trajectory of rocks or hardened soil clumps falling from the haul trucks and provided recommendations for mitigation measures. As a result, an engineered rockfall fence was built to capture rocks and debris. This paper presents some of the challenges of this unique heavy-load design and construction project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTransportation Safety and Impact AnalysisFrench-language works237,207