Pose Measurement of the EndoWrist Round Tip Scissor Instrument with Optical Coherence Tomography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract To automate surgical (sub-)tasks in robotic surgery, the knowledge of the exact pose of the instrument is mandatory. The application of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) to the problem of pose measurement appears promising due to its advantages of 3D imaging and micron-scale resolution. To investigate this, 175 image sequences of the EndoWrist Round Tip Scissor Tool were acquired with an OCT system. The images differ in the opening angles of the scissor blades and the rotation angles of the entire instrument about its central axis. These image sequences were further processed through computer vision methods of the individual images followed by point cloud generation. For pose estimation, an Iterative Closest Point algorithm was implemented to register the acquired point clouds to reference point clouds created from the instrument CAD file. The implemented algorithm was able to determine the opening angle with an overall error of 2∘ ± 1.3∘ and the rotation angle with a standard deviation between several runs of 0.6∘ ±2.8∘. However, the overall processing time of (39 ± 17)s on a standard PC leaves room for further investigations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".