MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402497483 · doi:10.3389/fgene.2024.1464556

Case report: Early (molecular) diagnosis is the clue: report on ALDH7A1 deficiency in newborns

2024· article· en· W4402497483 on OpenAlexaff
Patryk Lipiński, Katarzyna Wójcicka-Kowalczyk, Anna Bogdańska, Ewa Ehmke, Magdalena Pajdowska, Katarzyna Skrzypek, Agnieszka Charzewska, Dorota Hoffman‐Zacharska

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Genetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsIONICS Mass Spectrometry (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first-tier genetic testing for developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE) is now increasingly used in routine clinical practice. Antiquitin deficiency, also referred to as pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy (PDE-ALDH7A1), represents an inherited metabolic disorder with the phenotype of an early infantile DEE. In addition to the fact that biochemical biomarkers of PDE-ALDH7A1, including α-aminoadipic semialdehyde dehydrogenase, pipecolic acid (PA), Δ1-piperideine-6-carboxylate, and 6-oxopipecolate (6-oxo-PIP), are well-characterized, and their analysis and usefulness have some limitations. Here, we describe the case of a newborn presenting with seizures from the first hours of life, who was resistant to standard antiepileptic drugs and was found to be a biallelic compound heterozygote of two clearly pathogenic variants in the ALDH7A1 gene based on targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). The diagnostic process of PDE-ALDH7A1 was limited by the possibility to determine only urinary PA and 6-oxo-PIP (urinary organic acid profile using the GC–MS method), and the exogenous peak of levetiracetam, due to the fact that it has a similar retention time as 6-oxo-PIP, masked the detection of 6-oxo-PIP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in GeneticsSame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207