Association between ASPECTS region of infarction and clinical outcome in non-acute large vessel occlusion ischaemic stroke after endovascular recanalisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study retrospectively investigated whether infarction in specific Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) regions is associated with clinical outcome in patients with symptomatic non-acute internal carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusion who underwent endovascular recanalisation (ER). METHODS: Preoperative ASPECTS and region of infarction were recorded before recanalisation. Clinical outcome was evaluated 90 days after the procedure using the modified Rankin Scale; a score>2 was defined as poor outcome. Secondary outcomes included postprocedural cerebral oedema, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH. RESULTS: Among the 86 patients included, 90-day outcome was poor in 30 (34.9%) and 40 experienced cerebral oedema (46.5%). Multivariate logistic regression models showed that lenticular nucleus infarction (OR 19.61-26.00, p<0.05), admission diastolic blood pressure (OR 1.07-1.08, p<0.05), preprocedural National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (OR 1.96-2.05, p<0.001) and haemorrhagic transformation (OR 14.99-18.81, p<0.05) were independent predictors of poor 90-day outcome. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for lenticular nucleus infarction as a predictor of poor outcome was 0.73. M2 region infarction (OR 26.07, p<0.001) and low American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology collateral circulation grade (OR 0.16, p=0.001) were independent predictors of postprocedural cerebral oedema. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for M2 region infarction as a predictor of cerebral oedema was 0.64. Region of infarction did not significantly differ between patients with and without postprocedural ICH or symptomatic ICH. CONCLUSIONS: Lenticular nucleus and M2 region infarction were independent predictors of poor 90-day outcome and postprocedural cerebral oedema, respectively, in patients with non-acute anterior circulation large artery occlusion who underwent ER.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".