MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402501371 · doi:10.62347/yfai7091

Effects of dexmedetomidine on renal function, inflammatory markers, and cognitive functioning in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement surgery

2024· article· en· W4402501371 on OpenAlex
Xiucai Hu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Translational Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDexmedetomidineMedicinePostoperative cognitive dysfunctionHip replacementCognitionRenal functionHip surgeryOrthopedic surgeryArthroplastySurgeryAnesthesiaInternal medicineSedationPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine on renal function, inflammatory markers, and cognitive outcome, and to identify factors influencing early postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 162 elderly patients who underwent hip replacement surgery at Cangzhou Central Hospital from March 2022 to May 2023. Patients were divided into a control group (without dexmedetomidine) and an experimental group (with dexmedetomidine). Measurements included creatinine (Cr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), interleukin 1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, and the incidence of POCD seven days postoperatively. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were employed to investigate the predictors of early POCD. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of renal function, inflammatory markers, and cognitive outcome (Cr, BUN, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 and MoCA scores) (all P<0.05). The experimental group showed a significantly lower incidence of POCD at seven days post-surgery (P<0.05). Logistic regression identified having a neuron-specific enolase (NSE) level seven days post-surgery ≥7.0 pg/ml as a risk factor for early POCD (P=0.001, OR=3.987, 95% CI: 1.789-8.886), whereas intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine was a protective factor (P=0.041, OR=0.424, 95% CI: 0.187-0.964). CONCLUSION: The use of dexmedetomidine in hip replacement surgery can mitigate postoperative renal injury and inflammatory response, enhance cognitive outcome, and significantly reduce the incidence and risk of early POCD in elderly patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it