MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402501842 · doi:10.11159/icbb24.123

Mitral Regurgitation And Atrial Fibrillation: An Explorative Fluid-Structure Interaction Study

2024· article· en· W4402501842 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Giulio Musotto, Alessandra Monteleone, Danila Vella, Leon Menezes, Andrew C. Cook, Giorgia M. Bosi, Gaetano Burriesci

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on New Technologies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiologyInternal medicineAtrial fibrillationMitral regurgitationRegurgitation (circulation)Medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia which promotes blood stagnation into the left atrial appendage (LAA), a muscular sac attached to the left atrium of the heart. This stasis increases the risk of blood clot formation and ischaemic complications [1]. This pathology strongly increases with age, affecting about 8% of octogenarians. This implies that it is often concomitant with other common age elated cardiac pathologies such as mitral regurgitation (MR), a condition where the mitral valve does not close properly, allowing blood to flow back from the left ventricle into the left atrium. Some clinical studies have explored the association between AF and MR, suggesting that MR might have some protective effect, reducing the probability of clot formation [2-4]. This study aims to investigates how the interaction between AF and MR may alter the haemodynamics into the LAA, to identify the biomechanics of the phenomenon [5]. To this end, computational approaches are adopted, which have already demonstrated their efficacy in investigating the complex relationship between the LAA anatomy and operative function and the risk of thromboembolism in AF patients [6-9]. These computational tools, mentioned above, have demonstrated significant effectiveness in elucidating the underlying mechanisms of thromboembolic risk in patients with AF. In particular, a fluid-structure interaction approach is used to simulate blood flow in the LAA under three different conditions: healthy, AF and MR. Results indicate that MR has a significant impact on the motility of LAA, improve the wash out and reduce stagnation. Moreover, the blood stasis factor (BSF), a factor recently identified to quantify the risk of clot formation in LAA, reduces of two folds [9]. This supports the protective effect of MR observed clinically, clarifying the mechanism. These findings suggest that both LAA features and MR should be taken into consideration when assessing the thromboembolic risk in patients with AF. A combined approach, both numerical and clinical, could potentially improve patient management strategies and lead to a reduction in stroke events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on New TechnologiesSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207