MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402506611 · doi:10.1038/s41380-024-02736-w

Transcriptomic profiles in major depressive disorder: the role of immunometabolic and cell-cycle-related pathways in depression with different levels of inflammation

2024· article· en· W4402506611 on OpenAlexaff
Luca Sforzini, Moira Marizzoni, Chiara Bottanelli, Veronika Kunšteková, Valentina Zonca, Samantha Saleri, Melisa Kose, Giulia Lombardo, Nicole Mariani, Maria Antonietta Nettis, Naghmeh Nikkheslat, Courtney Worrell, Zuzanna Zajkowska, Linda Pointon, Philip J. Cowen, Jonathan Cavanagh, Neil A. Harrison, Marco Andrea Riva, Valeria Mondelli, Edward T. Bullmore, Annamaria Cattaneo, Carmine M. Pariante

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Psychiatry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersMedical Research CouncilH. Lundbeck A/SDepartment of Health and Social CareNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchWellcome TrustEuropean Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and AssociationsWellcomeEli Lilly and CompanyNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and DepressionNIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research CentreGlaxoSmithKlineNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreEuropean CommissionPfizerKing's College London
KeywordsTranscriptomeMajor depressive disorderInflammationDepression (economics)Internal medicineC-reactive proteinBiological pathwayBipolar disorderMedicineBioinformaticsOncologyEndocrinologyBiologyGene expressionGeneGeneticsLithium (medication)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transcriptomic profiles are important indicators for molecular mechanisms and pathways involved in major depressive disorder (MDD) and its different phenotypes, such as immunometabolic depression. We performed whole-transcriptome and pathway analyses on 139 individuals from the observational, case-control, BIOmarkers in DEPression (BIODEP) study, 105 with MDD and 34 controls. We divided MDD participants based on levels of inflammation, as measured by serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), in n = 39 'not inflamed' (CRP < 1 mg/L), n = 31 with 'elevated CRP' (1-3 mg/L), and n = 35 with 'low-grade inflammation' (>3 mg/L). We performed whole-blood RNA sequencing using Illumina NextSeq 550 and statistical analyses with the Deseq2 package for R statistics (RUV-corrected) and subsequent pathway analyses with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Immunometabolic pathways were activated in individuals with CRP > 1 mg/L, although surprisingly the CRP 1-3 group showed stronger immune activation than the CRP > 3 group. The main pathways identified in the comparison between CRP < 1 group and controls were cell-cycle-related, which may be protective against immunometabolic abnormalities in this 'non-inflamed' depressed group. We further divided MDD participants based on exposure and response to antidepressants (n = 47 non-responders, n = 37 responders, and n = 22 unmedicated), and identified specific immunomodulatory and neuroprotective pathways in responders (especially vs. non-responders), which could be relevant to treatment response. In further subgroup analyses, we found that the specific transcriptional profile of responders is independent of CRP levels, and that the inhibition of cell-cycle-related pathways in MDD with CRP < 1 mg/L is present only in those who are currently depressed, and not in the responders. The present study demonstrates immunometabolic and cell-cycle-related transcriptomic pathways associated with MDD and different (CRP-based and treatment-based) MDD phenotypes, while shedding light on potential molecular mechanisms that could prevent or facilitate an individual's trajectory toward immunometabolic depression and/or treatment-non-responsive depression. The recognition and integration of these mechanisms will facilitate a precision-medicine approach in MDD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PsychiatrySame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207